“Paul appears to indicate no, essentially affirming that improvement in behavior is achievable and needed for gays and lesbians... ”
“What the individual, plus the Church, has to realize is the fact that a gay person’s general objective is certainly not to be right; instead, the entire objective by God’s elegance is usually to be similar to Jesus, just like this really is every Christian’s ultimate objective in life (Titus 2:11-14). ”
I am maybe not certain that which you object to with regard to Daniel and exactly how it pertains to this short article you've got associated with. As an example, Daniel *agrees* with you that dealing with a homosexual identification is a issue. He says: “I’m sympathetic to your focus that “the homosexual identification” is one thing individuals have to leave behind. ”
He additionally acknowledges that arsenokoitai relates to males who possess intercourse with guys and that this can be one thing Paul objects to. Once more, agreeing to you that this really is sin.
I will be presuming because he rightly recognizes that modern categories of sexual identity is not what Paul is referring to that you have misinterpreted Daniel as saying that gay people should not leave behind a gay identity. It could be anachronistic to claim that. You, first and foremost, should notice that since this is certainly one of your primary arguments–sexual identification is really a contemporary trend.